While the use of pesticides to manage wildlife is a common method of controlling wildlife, there are several considerations that need to be addressed when deciding on the best course of action. First, an ethical decision should consider the harms and benefits of eradicating a particular species. This is especially true when there is a risk to human safety. It is also important to consider animal welfare and property values when making this decision. Some methods of control are better than others, depending on the situation and the nature of the problems.
If a wildlife problem requires human intervention, the first step is to change the behavior of the wild animals. Changing human behavior is the obvious answer to preventing animal infestation. However, if a creature has learned an unsavory behavior, wildlife control may be necessary. To help prevent further damage, a professional should learn the laws and regulations regarding the treatment of wildlife. The humane treatment of an animal is also an important consideration. By addressing the cause and removing the cause, a technician can help preserve the area.
An objective for the purpose of wildlife control should be clearly stated and measurable. Moreover, the method used must also consider the extent and type of harm that a population has suffered and its impact on the environment. The aim of a wildlife control method should be based on the reduction of the harm desired by the target species. This means that it must be rooted in an adaptive management framework and must have measurable outcomes. In addition, it should be able to monitor the progress of the wildlife population.
When considering a wildlife control method, it is important to be aware of the ethics involved. Generally, the company that employs a WDM operator will not kill the animals but will remove them and reunite them with their mothers. Alternatively, the animal control operator will perform humane capture or damage. If the species is already present, the person removing the animal will be responsible for the destruction. In addition to humane removal, a company may only provide pictures of the animals that are a threat to the property.
In a similar vein, the decision on whether to use wildlife control should be based on the circumstances of the case. In general, an animal control service should not be used if the animal is a danger to human life. An individual should not intentionally feed a wild animal to avoid a conflict. The person should never feed an animal to an animal. It is better to let the animals live in the open. This is not only ethical but will also protect the environment.