We must first abandon fossil fuels because they contribute

The vitality of our economy today is our dependence of fossil-fuels. Today the majority of energy used within the United States is derived from burning fossil fuels. They account for three-fourths of all human emissions over the last 20 years. Scientists have looked for ways to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, and to make the burning of fossil fuels more sustainable. Let’s look at the ways fossil fuels can benefit us in our everyday lives.

Rebel Media

We must first abandon fossil fuels because they contribute to the issue, and search at ways of improving our systems for energy. We must resist the government’s backing for fossil fuels and instead focus on investing on renewable infrastructure as well as green jobs. Our nations must be able to meet those UN Sustainable Development Goals, including SDG 7: Energy access for everyone. It is possible to look up policies that support fossil fuels in the The database of the OECD’s fossil fuel-supporting measures.

The shift from coal to wood began around the beginning of the 1700s, in the industry of iron. The coal industry soon replaced biomass as the primary fuel for industrial use. In 1900, coal was responsible for half the world’s use of fuel. It is plentiful and has an energy density that is higher that dry wood. In the 1950s coal was widely distributed which made it the preferred fuel for ship engines and locomotives. Because coal is easy to store and transport so it quickly became the preferred fuel in a wide range of industries.

Fossil fuel subsidies are believed to be responsible for two-thirds of the total global CO2 emissions. The percentage of short-lived carbon dioxide emissions resulting from energy production is thought to be greater than what the official figures indicate. However biomass fuels are commonly utilized to cook and for small-scale heating, however they are usually inefficient and polluting. They also negatively impact the indoor air quality in many countries that are less developed. The use of these chemicals is not sustainable in today’s economy.

The burning of fossil fuels is a major contributor to the rise in methane and carbon dioxide emissions. Both gases are released by fossil fuels when they are burned to produce heat and electricity. However, these emissions can have different impacts. In 2030 it is estimated that the United States could spend $30 trillion on fossil fuels. At that point the economy will spend $750 billion more per year than it did in 2006.

Carbon that is emitted during the combustion fossil fuels can be a byproduct which is usually returned to the soil during extraction process. This process is called enhanced oil recovery. It involves injecting CO2 in a pressurized manner into the reservoir for oil to extract more oil. Although this might seem like an unorthodox strategy, it’s possible to reduce the carbon emissions from produced oil and CO2 this way. The carbon released during oil production could result in negative emissions.

As carbon emissions rise globally, temperatures could increase by three up to 4 degrees Celsius. The financial markets will fall if we don’t cut down on the consumption of fossil fuels. The economic downturn which follows would be more serious, and the global economy will slow. Given the current climate crisis the only way to tackle the issue is to cut down on the global consumption of oil. If we don’t end our dependence on gas and oil and gas, we could experience a worldwide recession.